文章摘要
苑风云,孙钦军,刘金山,周京福,时超.轿车轮胎室内磨削方法对比分析[J].轮胎工业,2026,46(1):0061-0063 本文二维码信息
二维码(扫一下试试看!)
轿车轮胎室内磨削方法对比分析
Comparative Analysis on Indoor Grinding Method for Passenger Car Tire
投稿时间:2025-02-27  修订日期:2025-02-27
DOI:
中文关键词: 轿车轮胎  标准  磨削方法
英文关键词: passenger car tire  standard  grinding method
基金项目:
中图分类号:
作者单位E-mail
苑风云* 青岛市产品质量检验研究院 YFyun123@126.com 
孙钦军 青岛市产品质量检验研究院  
刘金山 青岛市产品质量检验研究院  
周京福 青岛市产品质量检验研究院  
时超 青岛市产品质量检验研究院  
摘要点击次数: 259
全文下载次数: 60
中文摘要:
      对比分析ECE R117 和 GB/T 42359—2023两种标准对轮胎磨削程序、磨削条件以及磨削后性能评估等方面的规定和要求,旨在明确两者在轮胎磨削方法上的异同点,提升轮胎性能评估的准确性,为轮胎制造商、测试机构以及相关行业从业人员提供指导和参考。对比分析发现,ECE R117并未详细规定轮胎磨削的具体方法或要求,而GB/T 42359—2023的要求则较详细和具体。
英文摘要:
      The regulations and requirements of ECE R117 and GB/T 42359—2023 regarding tire grinding procedures,grinding conditions and post-grinding performance evaluation were comparatively analyzed,aiming to clarify the similarities and differences in tire grinding methods between the two standards,and enhance the accuracy of tire performance assessment,which could provide guidance and references for tire manufacturers,testing institutions and professionals in related industries.Comparative analysis revealed that ECE R117 did not provide specific methods or requirements for tire grinding,while the requirements of GB/T 42359-2023 were more detailed and specific.
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
YUAN Fengyun Qingdao Product Quality Testing Research Institute YFyun123@126.com 
SUN Qinjun Qingdao Product Quality Testing Research Institute  
LIU Jinshan Qingdao Product Quality Testing Research Institute  
ZHOU Jingfu Qingdao Product Quality Testing Research Institute  
SHI Chao Qingdao Product Quality Testing Research Institute  
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭