| 杨姣.不同国家和地区轿车轮胎室内性能测试标准对比分析[J].轮胎工业,2024,44(8):0505-0508 |
二维码（扫一下试试看！） |
| 不同国家和地区轿车轮胎室内性能测试标准对比分析 |
| Comparative Analysis of Indoor Performance Testing Standards for Passenger Car Tire in Different Countries and Regions |
| 投稿时间：2023-06-19 修订日期：2023-06-19 |
| DOI：10.12135/j.issn.1006-8171.2024.08.0505 |
| 中文关键词: 轿车轮胎 室内性能 测试标准 差异 对比分析 |
| 英文关键词: passenger car tire indoor performance test standard difference comparative analysis |
| 基金项目: |
| 中图分类号: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 728 |
| 全文下载次数: 794 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 对比分析中国、欧洲、美国、巴西、印度和印度尼西亚轿车轮胎室内性能测试标准，主要从充气外缘尺寸、高速性能、耐久性能、低气压耐久性能、脱圈阻力和强度性能测试标准的试验温度、充气压力和行驶时间等方面进行差异分析，为企业内部建立内控测试标准提供指导，从而使轮胎产品性能满足各国法规要求。结果表明：充气外缘尺寸测试需采取各国标准最严苛取值要求；高速性能试验按中国标准一般可以满足各国要求；耐久性能、脱圈阻力和强度性能测试各国标准差别较小，一般企业标准可以满足要求。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The indoor performance testing standards for passenger car tire in different countries and regions were analysed comparatively.The difference analysis was mainly conducted from the aspects of test temperature，inflation pressure and driving time etc. of inflated peripheral dimention，high-speed performance，durability，low-pressure durability，bead unseating resistance，strength performance test standards，providing guidance for establishing internal control test standards within enterprises，so as to ensure that tire product performance met the regulatory requirements of various countries.The results showed that the inflated peripheral dimention test needed to take the most stringent values requirements of various country standards.The high-speed performance test could generally meet the requirements of various countries according to Chinese standards.There is little difference in various country standards for durability，bead unseating resistance and strength performance tests，and general enterprise standards could meet the requirements. |
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
