| 张家强.不同防老剂在轮胎胎侧胶中的应用[J].轮胎工业,2024,44(6):0358-0361 |
二维码（扫一下试试看！） |
| 不同防老剂在轮胎胎侧胶中的应用 |
| Application of Different Antioxidants in Tire Sidewall Compound |
| 投稿时间：2022-10-12 修订日期：2022-10-12 |
| DOI：10.12135/j.issn.1006-8171.2024.06.0358 |
| 中文关键词: 防老剂 轮胎胎侧胶 耐老化性能 |
| 英文关键词: antioxidant tire sidewall rubber aging resistance |
| 基金项目: |
| 中图分类号: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 739 |
| 全文下载次数: 541 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 对比研究三嗪类防老剂TMPPD和喹啉类防老剂S-TMQ、AW在轮胎胎侧胶中的应用。结果表明：添加防老剂S-TMQ的混炼胶的加工性能和硫化特性较好；添加防老剂TMPPD硫化胶的静态耐臭氧老化性能、耐热氧老化性能和耐天候老化性能较好，添加防老剂S-TMQ的胶料次之，添加防老剂AW的胶料较差；防老剂S-TMQ与防老剂AW为相似结构，但相对分子质量不同，防护性能相差较大。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Application of triazine based antioxidant TMPPD and quinoline based antioxidant S-TMQ and AW in tire sidewall compounds was comparative studied.The results showed that the processing performance and vulcanization characteristics of the mixed rubber with the addition of antioxidant S-TMQ were good.The static ozone aging resistance，heat oxygen aging resistance，and weather aging resistance of vulcanized rubber with the addition of antioxidant TMPPD were better，followed by the rubber with the addition of antioxidant S-TMQ，and the rubber with the addition of antioxidant AW was worse.The structure of antioxidant S-TMQ and antioxidant AW was similar，but their relative molecular weight and protective properties differ greatly. |
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
