文章摘要
倪淑杰,闫福江,郭鹤莹,丁全勇.增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP在胎面胶中的应用对比[J].轮胎工业,2006,(8):486-488 本文二维码信息
二维码（扫一下试试看！）
增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP在胎面胶中的应用对比
Comparison between plasticizer A and Aktiplast AP applied in tread compound
  
DOI：
中文关键词: 增塑剂  组分剖析  门尼粘度  硫化速度  物理性能
英文关键词: plasticizer  composition analysis  Mooney viscosity  curing rate  physical properties
基金项目:
中图分类号:TQ330.38＋4
作者单位
倪淑杰 三角轮胎股份有限公司 
闫福江 三角轮胎股份有限公司 
郭鹤莹 三角轮胎股份有限公司 
丁全勇 三角轮胎股份有限公司 
摘要点击次数: 698
全文下载次数: 555
中文摘要:
      进行增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP的组分分析并研究其在胎面胶中的应用效果。结果表明，增塑剂A中软脂酸含量较大，莱茵塑分AP中硬脂酸和油酸含量较大；莱茵塑分AP对胶料流动性和分散性改善效果优于增塑剂A；加入增塑剂A和莱茵塑分AP的胶料焦烧时间有所延长、硫化速度减慢，硫化胶的邵尔A型硬度和300%定伸应力略有提高，拉断伸长率稍有下降。
英文摘要:
      The composition of plasticizer A and Aktiplast AP was analyzed and their effectiveness in tread compound was investigated.The results showed that plasticizer A contained more palmicacid，and Aktiplast AP contained more stearic acid and oleic acid；in terms of improving compound flowability and dispersity，Aktiplast AP was better than plasticizer A；and the scorch time of compound extended and the curing rate decreased，and the Shore A hardness and modulus at 300% of vulcainzate increased a little，but the elongation at break somewhat decreased by adding plasticizer A or Aktiplast AP.
Author NameAffiliation
NI Shu-jie Triangle Tire Co.，Ltd 
YAN Fu-jiang Triangle Tire Co.，Ltd 
GUO He-ying Triangle Tire Co.，Ltd 
DING Quan-yong Triangle Tire Co.，Ltd 
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭